What Wildbook should this feature be in?
GiraffeSpotter
What would you like to see?
Can we please add Buffalo Springs National Reserve, Samburu National Reserve, and Chololo Ranch as locations under Northern Kenya. For these can we keep the same naming convention (eg. BSNRXXX).
Can we also edit the names in the uploader sent to the support email to the Chololo name (ChoXXX).
uploader: Chololo RA 2024
How would this functionality help you?
If requesting a new location ID, include
Is this is nested beneath another location in the hierarchy?
Is there a prefix for region-based naming? (optional)
GPS coordinates (optional)
Note:Not all feature requests can be accepted, but all of them are reviewed by our product team. We’re unable to provide implementation timelines for accepted requests. We are a small team with many competing priorities. Thanks for your understanding!
I don’t understand the question. If this is related to a bulk import, it should have its own separate post so work on that can be tracked independently of the location ID update.
The individuals have already been named in GiraffeSpotter but because Chololo wasn’t a location on the site, they haven’t been named following our standard naming convention. So I was hoping we could use the export I sent over in the email to rename those individuals to match our naming convention (eg. for Chololo 001 would change to Cho001). Would this be possible?
Thanks for clarifying! It looks like the current IDs are numerical only, such as 069. You’re saying this should be updated to Cho069, right? Let me verify if this is something we can do on our side with a script.
If not, the alternative is to manually update the IDs from the Marked Individual pages.
I’ve been told that updating the giraffes’ names manually for 75 giraffes would be faster than writing and running a script for it. All future giraffes identified in Chololo Ranch will automatically have the “Cho” prefix in their ID.
So I did the rename manually but now even for these new locations the standard naming convention is not updated. I thought we previously made it so that anytime a new location was added we adopted the naming convention of “xxx001”? If not, is this something we can make happen?
Thanks for your patience. I’ve used this test encounter to troubleshoot the IDs. I was able to see the correct IDs suggested from the edit Individual section:
I’ve deleted SNR001 from the test encounters, so it can be re-used but it may need to be manually assigned since GiraffeSpotter will recommend the next ID as SNR002.
However, I did make an error here:
{
"name": "Buffalo Springs National Reserve",
"id": "Buffalo Springs National Reserve",
"prefix": "BSNR",
"prefixDigitPadding": 3
},
That 3 should have been a 4 since BSNR is 4 characters long. I’ve updated it and now BSNR is appearing as an ID prefix now.