Proposed matches for opposing viewpoints

Hi Maureen,

This was a detection prediction of “down” (rather than the expected prediction of “left”) on the viewpoint, causing it to match against what looks like a rogue’s gallery of other “down” and down-related (mis)predictions.

It may be that “down” is a viewpoint class with insufficient data. If we see a lot of this, then we may eventually need to retrain the model with additional “down” examples or rebalance the dataset to do better at this viewpoint versus others.

With the misprediction of down, the system then actually behaved as designed and filtered on related viewpoints (where they were actual “down” viewpoints or not).

The workaround is to delete the annotation and redraw it manually, setting the correct viewpoint. Let’s monitor for more of these.

Thanks,
Jason

Hi @ACWadmin1,

Was this match kicked off by bulk import? I’m trying to understand the pathway because it is too many annotations ( against 8493 candidates). When I click start another match and make sure not to filter by location, I get a much smaller set of candidates (filtered by viewpoint), and a clean slate of no potential matches.

https://africancarnivore.wildbook.org/iaResults.jsp?taskId=452a36ef-eb96-4fd5-a874-1d84636cf1c3

Was it kicked off by bulk import matching?

Thanks,
Jason

Perhaps. Please let me know if you can find a way to reproduce this. It is an unusual result, but I can’t find a pathway to recreate it and dig further.